Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Brain thickness determines political leaning

Neuroscientists are examining whether political allegiances are hard-wired into people after finding evidence that the brains of conservatives are a different shape to those of left-wingers.

Self-proclaimed right-wingers had a more pronounced amygdala - a primitive part of the brain associated with emotion while their political opponents from the opposite end of the spectrum had thicker anterior cingulates.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Surveys



If I ever teach a methodology class, this will be required viewing.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Social scientists build case for 'survival of the kindest'

It is about time science caught up with human experience. Now we just need to build a new economics based on this as the underlying theory of man.

Friday, September 10, 2010

engineering: the foundation of the modern world

Genteel Nation

makes me want to volunteer at Chelsea High School and get kids into engineering. now if i could turn that into a social business...

Thursday, September 09, 2010

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Digital Devices Deprive Brain of Needed Downtime

At the University of Michigan, a study found that people learned significantly better after a walk in nature than after a walk in a dense urban environment, suggesting that processing a barrage of information leaves people fatigued.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Meditation For A Stronger Brain

For the rest of the hour, take a deep, cleansing breath for a look at the science of meditation, because this week, researchers say a certain form of meditation can actually change the wiring in your brain. Students who practice the meditation for just 11 hours over a period of a few weeks had changes in brain connectivity that could be seen on a brain scan. The work was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

Listen to the Story

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Inside the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

These days the former Microsoft boss Bill Gates devotes his time to running what has arguably become the most powerful charitable organisation in the world. Is this the future of giving - and, if so, is that a good thing?

Habits of Happiness

Monday, August 09, 2010

BREAKING: Google goes "evil"

I just got off a media conference call with Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg.

They announced a new policy recommendation that would kill the Internet as we know it, if implemented by FCC Chair Julius Genokowski and other policy makers.

Sign the Emergency Petition to Google: Don't be evil - stand up for the free and open Internet

Sunday, August 08, 2010

See, sanity isn't that hard

Wallace admits that 'activist judges' = 'judges decide something you don't like".

But Will It Make You Happy?

How to buy yourself happiness


Friday, July 09, 2010

Thursday, July 08, 2010

A "renaissance" in HIV vaccine research

Antibody Kills 91% of HIV Strains

I remember hearing in 1990 a prediction that we would have an HIV vaccine by 1997. Here's hoping this turns into something.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Money Can't Buy America Love

Millions of dollars are being pumped into hearts and minds projects from Kabul to Kandahar. Trouble is, it's not working. And it might even be making things worse.

Wednesday, June 09, 2010

Monday, May 31, 2010

Canada, blowin' smoke

weird! boston is currently engulfed in smoke. its smells and looks like the whole city is on fire. thanks canada!

Friday, May 28, 2010

Lucky Harry

Not long ago Harry Reid looked like he might go the way of Chris Dodd. And he still has a hell of a battle on his hands for reelection. But for an interlocking series of reasons, things seem at least a little brighter than they did only a couple months ago.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Kristof's katastrophic kolumn

Moonshine or the Kids?

A blogpost response here: Poor People Behaving Badly?

Read some of the comments -- they are quite interesting.

another piece: Pissed off by Kristof

btw -- the title is just an alliteration, not an allusion to the KKK.

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Is Marriage Good for Your Health?

Initial research was an overwhelming yes... but our understanding is getting a bit more nuanced:
But while it’s clear that marriage is profoundly connected to health and well-being, new research is increasingly presenting a more nuanced view of the so-called marriage advantage. Several new studies, for instance, show that the marriage advantage doesn’t extend to those in troubled relationships, which can leave a person far less healthy than if he or she had never married at all. One recent study suggests that a stressful marriage can be as bad for the heart as a regular smoking habit. And despite years of research suggesting that single people have poorer health than those who marry, a major study released last year concluded that single people who have never married have better health than those who married and then divorced.
...
Kiecolt-Glaser told me that the overall health lesson to take away from the new wave of marriage-and-health literature is that couples should first work to repair a troubled relationship and learn to fight without hostility and derision. But if staying married means living amid constant acrimony, from the point of view of your health, “you’re better off out of it,” she says.
There is even a biological reason why, if your partner is under some stress, that a simple holding of the hand, or a hug can do wonders:
Researchers have also started to examine the salutary health effects of social relationships, including those of a good marriage. In one recent study, James A. Coan, an assistant professor of psychology and a neuroscientist at the University of Virginia, recruited 16 women who scored relatively high on a questionnaire assessing marital happiness. He placed each woman in three different situations while monitoring her brain with an f.M.R.I. machine, which offers a way to observe the brain’s response to almost any kind of emotional stimulation. In one situation, to simulate stress, he subjected the woman to a mild electric shock. In a second, the shock was administered, but the woman held the hand of a stranger; in a third, the hand of her husband.

Both instances of hand-holding reduced the neural activity in areas of the woman’s brain associated with stress. But when the woman was holding her husband’s hand, the effect was even greater, and it was particularly pronounced in women who had the highest marital-happiness scores. Holding a husband’s hand during the electric shock resulted in a calming of the brain regions associated with pain similar to the effect brought about by use of a pain-relieving drug.

Coan says the study simulates how a supportive marriage and partnership gives the brain the opportunity to outsource some of its most difficult neural work. “When someone holds your hand in a study or just shows that they are there for you by giving you a back rub, when you’re in their presence, that becomes a cue that you don’t have to regulate your negative emotion,” he told me. “The other person is essentially regulating your negative emotion but without your prefrontal cortex. It’s much less wear and tear on us if we have someone there to help regulate us.”
There are a lot more interesting experiments in that article.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Krugman: Building a Green Economy

If you listen to climate scientists — and despite the relentless campaign to discredit their work, you should — it is long past time to do something about emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. If we continue with business as usual, they say, we are facing a rise in global temperatures that will be little short of apocalyptic. And to avoid that apocalypse, we have to wean our economy from the use of fossil fuels, coal above all.

But is it possible to make drastic cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions without destroying our economy?

Thursday, April 08, 2010

Why I won't buy an iPad (and think you shouldn't, either)

Gadgets come and gadgets go
Gadgets come and gadgets go. The iPad you buy today will be e-waste in a year or two (less, if you decide not to pay to have the battery changed for you). The real issue isn't the capabilities of the piece of plastic you unwrap today, but the technical and social infrastructure that accompanies it.

If you want to live in the creative universe where anyone with a cool idea can make it and give it to you to run on your hardware, the iPad isn't for you.

If you want to live in the fair world where you get to keep (or give away) the stuff you buy, the iPad isn't for you.

If you want to write code for a platform where the only thing that determines whether you're going to succeed with it is whether your audience loves it, the iPad isn't for you.

Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Google PowerMeter

... is a free energy monitoring tool that helps you save energy and money. Using energy information provided by utility smart meters and energy monitoring devices, Google PowerMeter enables you to view your home's energy consumption from anywhere online. Find out what people are saying about Google PowerMeter.

Unfortunately, it isn't in my area yet... here is a piece on the back-story.

Tuesday, April 06, 2010

Neologisms and such

Once again, The Washington Post has published the winning
submissions to its yearly neologism contest, in which readers
are asked to supply alternate meanings for common words. The
winners are:

1. Coffee (n.), the person upon whom one coughs.
2. Flabbergasted (adj.), appalled over how much weight you have
gained.
3. Abdicate (v.), to give up all hope of ever having a flat
stomach.
4. Esplanade (v.), to attempt an explanation while drunk.
5. Willy-nilly (adj.), impotent.
6. Negligent (adj.), describes a condition in which you
absentmindedly answer the door in your nightgown.
7. Lymph (v.), to walk with a lisp.
8. Gargoyle (n.), olive-flavored mouthwash.
9. Flatulence (n.) emergency vehicle that picks you up after
you are run over by a steamroller.
10. Balderdash (n.), a rapidly receding hairline.
11. Testicle (n.), a humorous question in an exam.
12. Rectitude (n.), the formal, dignified bearing adopted by
proctologists.
13. Pokemon (n), a Rastafarian proctologist.
14. Oyster (n.), a person who sprinkles his conversation with
Yiddishisms.
15. Frisbeetarianism (n.), (back by popular demand): The belief
that, when you die, your Soul flies up onto the roof and gets
stuck there.
16. Circumvent (n.), an opening in the front of boxer shorts
worn by Jewish men.

The Washington Post's Style Invitational also asked readers to
take any word from the dictionary, alter it by adding,
subtracting, or changing one letter, and supply a new
definition. Here are this year's winners:
1. Bozone (n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that
stops bright ideas from penetrating. The bozone layer,
unfortunately, shows little sign of breaking down in the near
future.
2. Foreploy (v): Any misrepresentation about yourself for the
purpose of getting laid.
3. Cashtration (n.): The act of buying a house, which renders
the subject financially impotent for an indefinite period.
4. Giraffiti (n): Vandalism spray-painted very, very high.
5. Sarchasm (n): The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit
and the person who doesn't get it.
6. Inoculatte (v): To take coffee intravenously when you are
running late.
7. Hipatitis (n): Terminal coolness.
8. Osteopornosis (n): A degenerate disease. (This one got extra
credit.)
9. Karmageddon (n): it's like, when everybody is sending off
all these really bad vibes, right? And then, like, the Earth
explodes and it's like, a serious bummer.
10. Decafalon (n.): The gruelling event of getting through the
day consuming only things that are good for you.
11. Glibido (v): All talk and no action.
12. Dopeler effect (n): The tendency of stupid ideas to seem
smarter when they come at you rapidly.
13. Arachnoleptic fit (n.): The frantic dance performed just
after you've accidentally walked through a spider web.
14. Beelzebug (n.): Satan in the form of a mosquito that gets
into your bedroom at three in the morning and cannot be cast
out.
15. Caterpallor (n.): The colour you turn after finding half a
grub in the fruit you're eating.
And the pick of the literature:
16. Ignoranus (n): A person who's both stupid & an ass hole.

Episode 20: Corruption

Daniel Kaufmann and Mushtaq Khan debate the role and importance of tackling corruption as part of a development strategy.

Monday, March 22, 2010

Armageddon!!

Better fill your shelter with goodies... and wtf was the "here comes Speedy" comment? Anyone have a clue?

Whats in the bill

Here is what to expect if the bill becomes law:

WITHIN THE FIRST YEAR OF ENACTMENT

*Insurance companies will be barred from dropping people from coverage when they get sick. Lifetime coverage limits will be eliminated and annual limits are to be restricted.

*Insurers will be barred from excluding children for coverage because of pre-existing conditions.

*Young adults will be able to stay on their parents' health plans until the age of 26. Many health plans currently drop dependents from coverage when they turn 19 or finish college.

*Uninsured adults with a pre-existing conditions will be able to obtain health coverage through a new program that will expire once new insurance exchanges begin operating in 2014.

*A temporary reinsurance program is created to help companies maintain health coverage for early retirees between the ages of 55 and 64. This also expires in 2014.

*Medicare drug beneficiaries who fall into the "doughnut hole" coverage gap will get a $250 rebate. The bill eventually closes that gap which currently begins after $2,700 is spent on drugs. Coverage starts again after $6,154 is spent.

*A tax credit becomes available for some small businesses to help provide coverage for workers.

*A 10 percent tax on indoor tanning services that use ultraviolet lamps goes into effect on July 1.

WHAT HAPPENS IN 2011

*Medicare provides 10 percent bonus payments to primary care physicians and general surgeons.

*Medicare beneficiaries will be able to get a free annual wellness visit and personalized prevention plan service. New health plans will be required to cover preventive services with little or no cost to patients.

*A new program under the Medicaid plan for the poor goes into effect in October that allows states to offer home and community based care for the disabled that might otherwise require institutional care.

*Payments to insurers offering Medicare Advantage services are frozen at 2010 levels. These payments are to be gradually reduced to bring them more in line with traditional Medicare.

*Employers are required to disclose the value of health benefits on employees' W-2 tax forms.

*An annual fee is imposed on pharmaceutical companies according to market share. The fee does not apply to companies with sales of $5 million or less.

WHAT HAPPENS IN 2012

*Physician payment reforms are implemented in Medicare to enhance primary care services and encourage doctors to form "accountable care organizations" to improve quality and efficiency of care.

*An incentive program is established in Medicare for acute care hospitals to improve quality outcomes.

*The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which oversees the government programs, begin tracking hospital readmission rates and puts in place financial incentives to reduce preventable readmissions.

WHAT HAPPENS IN 2013

*A national pilot program is established for Medicare on payment bundling to encourage doctors, hospitals and other care providers to better coordinate patient care.

*The threshold for claiming medical expenses on itemized tax returns is raised to 10 percent from 7.5 percent of income. The threshold remains at 7.5 percent for the elderly through 2016.

*The Medicare payroll tax is raised to 2.35 percent from 1.45 percent for individuals earning more than $200,000 and married couples with incomes over $250,000. The tax is imposed on some investment income for that income group.

*A 2.9 percent excise tax in imposed on the sale of medical devices. Anything generally purchased at the retail level by the public is excluded from the tax.

WHAT HAPPENS IN 2014

*State health insurance exchanges for small businesses and individuals open.

*Most people will be required to obtain health insurance coverage or pay a fine if they don't. Healthcare tax credits become available to help people with incomes up to 400 percent of poverty purchase coverage on the exchange.

*Health plans no longer can exclude people from coverage due to pre-existing conditions.

*Employers with 50 or more workers who do not offer coverage face a fine of $2,000 for each employee if any worker receives subsidized insurance on the exchange. The first 30 employees aren't counted for the fine.

*Health insurance companies begin paying a fee based on their market share.

WHAT HAPPENS IN 2015

*Medicare creates a physician payment program aimed at rewarding quality of care rather than volume of services.

WHAT HAPPENS IN 2018

*An excise tax on high cost employer-provided plans is imposed. The first $27,500 of a family plan and $10,200 for individual coverage is exempt from the tax. Higher levels are set for plans covering retirees and people in high risk professions.

12 Most Pesticide-Laden Fruits and Veggies

In descending order, the EWG's 12 most contaminated fruits and vegetables:
1. Peaches
2. Apples
3. Sweet bell peppers
4. Celery
5. Nectarines
6. Strawberries
7. Cherries
8. Kale
9. Lettuce
10. Grapes (imported)
11. Carrots
12. Pears
For the full list of all 47 fruits and veggies, go here.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Countdown to health reform wire

Things seem to be coming together today about as well as the Dems could have expected. They seem to be getting a number of the pro-life Dems to sign on. And Stupak seems to be conceding the vote though he'll personally still vote against. They got solid news from the CBO this morning and that's pulling a few of the Blue Dogs back into the fold. We're following every development in our TPM auto-updating Countdown to Reform Wire.
Latest news: With Bill Posted, 72 Hours Until Vote: The reconciliation bill just went online. That means the vote will happen in 72 hours, at about 2:15 p.m. Sunday.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

A man loves the meat in his youth that he cannot endure in his age.

Global meat production has tripled in the past three decades and could double its present level by 2050. That's likely to have a significant impact on human health, the environment, and the global economy in the next 50 year, according to a new two-volume report, Livestock in a Changing Landscape. Key findings regarding the economic and ecological footprint of livestock:

* More than 1.7 billion animals are used in livestock production worldwide and occupy more than one-fourth of the Earth's land.
* Production of animal feed consumes about one-third of Earth's total arable land.
* Livestock production accounts for approximately 40 percent of the global agricultural gross domestic product.
* Although 1 billion poor people derive part of their livelihood from domesticated animals, commercialized industrial livestock has displaced many small, rural producers in developing countries, like India and China.
* The livestock sector, including feed production and transport, is responsible for about 18 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions worldwide (the beef, pork and poultry industries emit large amounts of CO2, methane, and other greenhouse gases).
* The livestock sector is a major environmental polluter, with much of the world's pastureland degraded by grazing or feed production, and with many forests clear-cut to make way for additional farmland.
* Feed production requires intensive use of water, fertilizer, pesticides, and fossil fuels.
* Animal waste is a serious concern, since only a third of the nutrients fed to animals are actually absorbed and the rest pollute lands and waters.
* Total phosphorous excretions of livestock are estimated to be seven to nine times greater than from humans.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

sociological analysis through ideological glasses is easy!

Brooks comes out with a nice little piece: The Power Elite, that is a one of those odes to a better time when the blue blooded, working class white people were in charge, and everyone was happy. Well, those who mattered were, at least. They didn't poll the rest. Anyway, onward!

So, in a nutshell, here is his argument:
One of the great achievements of modern times is that we have made society more fair. Sixty years ago, the upper echelons were dominated by what E. Digby Baltzell called The Protestant Establishment and C. Wright Mills called The Power Elite. If your father went to Harvard, you had a 90 percent chance of getting in yourself, and the path upward from there was grooved in your favor.

Since then, we have opened up opportunities for women, African-Americans, Jews, Italians, Poles, Hispanics and members of many other groups. Moreover, we’ve changed the criteria for success. It is less necessary to be clubbable. It is more important to be smart and hard-working.

Yet here’s the funny thing. As we’ve made our institutions more meritocratic, their public standing has plummeted. We’ve increased the diversity and talent level of people at the top of society, yet trust in elites has never been lower.
Yes, he is arguing that fairness and increased diversity has led to a decrease in trust.

Oh, and just to be clear... I should point out that he doesn't present any data to support his underlying thesis off increased meritocracy or the decrease in trust. I assume they must be somehow temporally related, that is... increased meritocracy --> decrease in trust. He also doesn't really tell us what institutions is he talking about exactly? It is totally unclear in the piece... financial firms, public servants, politicians? This is actually quite important because it really matters what you are talking about when you talk about trust in government.

But, let's continue -- let's put aside the little issues such as all of the academic research on trust in government in the US that points to a wide variety of other factors, I'll even dismiss the argument that meritocracy in the US is failing, that the GOP often uses distrust in the government as a central campaign plank, and even the potential benefits of distrust

Let's suspend judgement for a second and give him the benefit of suspended judgement. So, prey tell, is the causal connection? What might be this general cause of distrust?
First, the meritocracy is based on an overly narrow definition of talent. Our system rewards those who can amass technical knowledge. But this skill is only marginally related to the skill of being sensitive to context. It is not related at all to skills like empathy. Over the past years, we’ve seen very smart people make mistakes because they didn’t understand the context in which they were operating.
With some extra-sensory sociological perception, Brooks intuits that people now have less empathy or sensitivity to context now as opposed to in his earlier time of eden. No need for data when you have the sixth-sociological sense! Also -- who knew that political cronyism and segregation meant more empathy and contextual knowledge... so awesome!

He continues
Third, leadership-class solidarity is weaker. The Protestant Establishment was inbred. On the other hand, those social connections placed informal limits on strife. Personal scandals were hushed up. Now members of the leadership class are engaged in a perpetual state of war. Each side seeks daily advantage in ways that poison the long-term reputations of everybody involved.
...
Fifth, society is too transparent. Since Watergate, we have tried to make government as open as possible. But as William Galston of the Brookings Institution jokes, government should sometimes be shrouded for the same reason that middle-aged people should be clothed. This isn’t Galston’s point, but I’d observe that the more government has become transparent, the less people are inclined to trust it.
Sure, this shape is rational!Gee, it sure was nicer when everyone could just agree -- democracy is so messy! And, let's just sweep this all under a rug. All this kerfuffle about pay-offs and public restrooms are ruining my dinner parties! Sarcasm aside -- I'll concede the bit on the perpetual state of war of the politicians. However, to argue that the poisened political environment is linked to diversity and ignore things like money to congress or the gerrymandering of congressional districts is just downright loco.

Let's soldier on!
Fourth, time horizons have shrunk. If you were an old blue blood, you traced your lineage back centuries, and there was a decent chance that you’d hand your company down to members of your clan. That subtly encouraged long-term thinking.
I'm still curious of who are these "old blue bloods"... and why can't people trace their lineages back centuries now? Too much diversity makes it too confusing, I suppose. Well, I might as well risk it all then!
Now people respond to ever-faster performance criteria — daily stock prices or tracking polls. This perversely encourages reckless behavior. To leave a mark in a fast, competitive world, leaders seek to hit grandiose home runs. Clinton tried to transform health care. Bush tried to transform the Middle East. Obama has tried to transform health care, energy and much more.
Wait -- isn't Bush a classic Blue Blood? Oh, I suppose he was Ivy League educated...
There’s less emphasis on steady, gradual change and more emphasis on the big swing. This produces more spectacular failures and more uncertainty. Many Americans, not caught up on the romance of this sort of heroism, are terrified.
Of course, no mention of the pattern of deregulation that began with his hero Regan. Or perhaps the real reason why people are terrified... losing their home, skyrocketing health care costs... The public option is popular -- so what is so terrifying?

Anyway, there is some more, but it is my bed-time, and now I can't get the 30 minutes back it took me to read the article and write this up. A piece that berates diversity based on a totally unclear concept, no empirical evidence, and not really much plausible theory. He also totally ignores incredibly important evidence that is linked to trust... for example, the fact that since the 70s we have progressively moved back to great gatsby levels of inequality, and the political economy that that entails - which seems especially important given that higher levels of inequality probably breeds distrust in government.

*sigh* well, at least he didn't base the argument on a story from a taxi driver.

Friday, February 05, 2010

More Stewart v. O'Reilly

You have to wait through a bunch of O
Reilly blah blah... but here goes:

Thursday, February 04, 2010

Something interesting

I'm certainly not an authority on this... but this is just something I think is interesting. We had the sub-prime crisis (purple in the first graph) which hit hard and bottomed out around Jan 2009 ... which is also when the DOW bottomed out. Next up are the Option ARM's (what are they? nightmare mortgages, apparently) which will start to peak around September 2011. Will that mean another tank of the market right around that time? I'm going to start divesting mid-2011.

Stewart v. O'Reilly, Round 1



Sunday, January 31, 2010

In Women, Training for a Sharper Mind

In particular, older women and strength training:
Older women who did an hour or two of strength training exercises each week had improved cognitive function a year later, scoring higher on tests of the brain processes responsible for planning and executing tasks, a new study has found.
...
A year later, the women who did strength training had improved their performance on tests of so-called executive function by 10.9 percent to 12.6 percent, while those assigned to balance and toning exercises experienced a slight deterioration — 0.5 percent. The improvements in the strength training group included an enhanced ability to make decisions, resolve conflicts and focus on subjects without being distracted by competing stimuli.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Just eat real food

I can't even follow the news on health care anymore, it is too pathetic. So instead, I will post on other matters.

Like: too much salt is bad for you. Oh, oops, it isn't! Wait, now it is.

Whatever. Just eat real food and stop eating most processed food-stuff (especially anything designed to have a longer shelf-life), and you'll probably be fine.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

New Years Surprise

Introducing the newest member of the Seward-Smith-Yates (!?) Family:


Encore! Encore!

Monday, January 18, 2010

pork in a petri disk

Pork in a petridish: Experts turn stem cells into meat

but will vegetarians eat this kind of meat?

in the future, will people grow meat in their basements?

Sunday, January 17, 2010

who knew?

Q: who will soon be the largest employer in Kenya?
A: 'txteagle'

the article is about the future of office work, and only describes txteagle in the beginning of the article, but nonetheless a surprising factoid (to me anyway).

here's a link to txteagle

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Google's new approach to China

Could spell the end of Google in China. Good for them to no longer support censorship.

[update] thought i'd counter-balance this a bit:

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Shorter Harper

Damned deomcracy make a country so unstable!

To justify his poroging of parliment (shutting it down), Harper, the PM of Canada argues taht he is just concerned about market stability!
In fact, he said it's when Parliament is sitting that Canada's stability comes into question. That's when "the games begin," he said, and his minority Conservative government faces the constant threat of defeat and an election.

"As soon as Parliament comes back, we're in a minority Parliament situation and the first thing that happens is a vote of confidence and there will be votes of confidence and election speculation for every single week after that for the rest of the year," he said.

"That's the kind of instability I think that markets are actually worried about. But you know the government will be well-prepared and I think Canadians want to see us focus on the economy."
Reminds me of Bush's quip:
"I told all four that there are going to be some times where we don't agree with each other, but that's OK. If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator," Bush joked.

Watching TV shortens life span, study finds

Not only that, you can't get that time back!
Researchers found that each hour a day spent watching TV was linked with an 18% greater risk of dying from cardiovascular disease, an 11% greater risk of all causes of death, and a 9% increased risk of death from cancer.

Monday, January 04, 2010

Reports on Copenhagen

And it ain't pretty.

Interview with German Environment Minister Norbert Röttgen: 'China Doesn't Want to Lead, and the US Cannot'

How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in the room
Copenhagen was a disaster. That much is agreed. But the truth about what actually happened is in danger of being lost amid the spin and inevitable mutual recriminations. The truth is this: China wrecked the talks, intentionally humiliated Barack Obama, and insisted on an awful "deal" so western leaders would walk away carrying the blame. How do I know this? Because I was in the room and saw it happen.
...
Copenhagen was much worse than just another bad deal, because it illustrated a profound shift in global geopolitics. This is fast becoming China's century, yet its leadership has displayed that multilateral environmental governance is not only not a priority, but is viewed as a hindrance to the new superpower's freedom of action. I left Copenhagen more despondent than I have felt in a long time. After all the hope and all the hype, the mobilisation of thousands, a wave of optimism crashed against the rock of global power politics, fell back, and drained away.

WTF?

Imagine the sh*t-storm if you interchanged those two religions around.

Search This Blog