Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Uzodinma Iweala

Stop Trying To 'Save' Africa
Perhaps most interesting is the language used to describe the Africa being saved. For example, the Keep a Child Alive/" I am African" ad campaign features portraits of primarily white, Western celebrities with painted "tribal markings" on their faces above "I AM AFRICAN" in bold letters. Below, smaller print says, "help us stop the dying."

Such campaigns, however well intentioned, promote the stereotype of Africa as a black hole of disease and death. News reports constantly focus on the continent's corrupt leaders, warlords, "tribal" conflicts, child laborers, and women disfigured by abuse and genital mutilation. These descriptions run under headlines like "Can Bono Save Africa?" or "Will Brangelina Save Africa?" The relationship between the West and Africa is no longer based on openly racist beliefs, but such articles are reminiscent of reports from the heyday of European colonialism, when missionaries were sent to Africa to introduce us to education, Jesus Christ and "civilization."

There is no African, myself included, who does not appreciate the help of the wider world, but we do question whether aid is genuine or given in the spirit of affirming one's cultural superiority. My mood is dampened every time I attend a benefit whose host runs through a litany of African disasters before presenting a (usually) wealthy, white person, who often proceeds to list the things he or she has done for the poor, starving Africans. Every time a well-meaning college student speaks of villagers dancing because they were so grateful for her help, I cringe. Every time a Hollywood director shoots a film about Africa that features a Western protagonist, I shake my head -- because Africans, real people though we may be, are used as props in the West's fantasy of itself. And not only do such depictions tend to ignore the West's prominent role in creating many of the unfortunate situations on the continent, they also ignore the incredible work Africans have done and continue to do to fix those problems.

Why do the media frequently refer to African countries as having been "granted independence from their colonial masters," as opposed to having fought and shed blood for their freedom? Why do Angelina Jolie and Bono receive overwhelming attention for their work in Africa while Nwankwo Kanu or Dikembe Mutombo, Africans both, are hardly ever mentioned? How is it that a former mid-level U.S. diplomat receives more attention for his cowboy antics in Sudan than do the numerous African Union countries that have sent food and troops and spent countless hours trying to negotiate a settlement among all parties in that crisis?

3 comments:

nick said...

This team from BU should pack-up and go home and let the Africans find their own water instead of letting these Westerners feed their egos.

Unknown said...

Yeah, I'm with Nick on this one. I don't really care if western aid and celebrity activism hurts the feelings of some African intellectual. If it helps people, that's enough.

Matthew said...

So one debate then is if western aid actually helps. I think it is a mixed bag. I have far more faith in small scale projects addressing concrete needs like the BU team, than the high level development approaches that emerge from large development institutions that ultimately are not accountable to anyone.

The other issue I believe is that there are many (not all of course) that still take a rather colonial approach to development. It really is smart white man coming in to save the day and in the process a lot of really good local ingenuity gets lost. (see for example: this)

So I agree with you too that we shouldn't throw out the concept of aid, but I think the author raises some important issues also :)

Search This Blog